Situatia partidelor socialdemocrate in UE

Sa analizam situatia partidelor socialdemocrate in UE. Procentele obtinute in alegerile parlamentare arata astfel:

Malta – 55,04% (2013: 54,08%),  PV=92,06% ===> Coalitie guvernamentala

Romania – 45,68% (2012: 33,61%), PV=39,78% ===> Coalitie guvernamentala

Marea Britanie  – 40,30% (2015: 30,50%), PV=68,70% ===> Opozitie

Croatia – 33,82% (2015;32,31%), PV=52,59% ===> Opozitie

Portugalia – 32,30% (2011 28,10%), PV=55,86% ===> Coalitie guvernamentala

Suedia  – 31% (2010: 30,70%), PV=85,80% ===> Coalitie guvernamentala

Slovacia  – 28,28% (2012: 44,41%), PV=59,82% ===> Coalitie guvernamentala 

Bulgaria – 27,19% (2014: 15,40%), PV=52,57% ===> Opozitie

Austria – 26,86%% (2013: 26,8%), PV=80% ===> Opozitie

Danemarca – 26,3% (2011: 24,8%), PV=85,80% ===> Opozitie

Letonia – 23% (2011: 28,40%), PV=58,85% ===> Opozitie,

Spania – 22,60% (2015: 22%), PV=22,63% ===> Opozitie

Belgia – 20,52% (2010: 22,94%), PV=89,45% ===> Opozitie

Germania – 20,50% (2013: 25,70%), PV=76,20% ===> Coalitie guvernamentala

Luxemburg – 20,20% (2009: 21.60%), PV= ===> Coalitie guvernamentala

Italia – 18,77% (2013: 26,45%) ===> Opozite

Ungaria – 17,91% (2014: 25,57%), PV=67,56% ===> Opozitie

Finlanda – 16,51% (2011: 19.10%) ===> Opozitie

Estonia – 15,2% (2011: 17,10) ===> Coalitie guvernamentala

Lituania – 15% (2012: 18,30%)  ===> Coalitie guvernamentala

Slovenia – 9,93% (2014: 10.5%), PV = 52,63% ===> Coalitie guvernamentala

Franta – 7,44% (2012: 29,35%) ===> Opozite

Cehia – 7,3% (2013: 20,5%) ===> Opozitie

Irlanda – 6,6% (2011: 19,5%)  ===> Opozitie 

Grecia – 6,28% (2015; 4,68%) ===> Opozitie

Cipru – 6,20% (2011: 8,90%) ===> Opozitie

Olanda – 5,70% (2012: 24,84%) ===> Opozitie

Polonia – partid neparlamentar

Socialdemocratii guverneaza in Malta, Italia, Romania, Portugalia, Slovacia, Suedia, Germania, Luxemburg, Estonia, Lituania, Slovenia.

In anul in curs este posibil ca socialdemocratii sa piarda guvernarea in Italia, Suedia, Letonia, Luxemburg si Slovenia. In fostele tari comuniste socialdemocratii guverneaza in Slovacia, Estonia, Lituania si Slovenia. In restul tarilor socialdemocratii se pozitioneaza sub marja de 25%, in Polonia socialdemocratii se afla in afara parlamentului.

Se observa ca in Franta, Olanda, Grecia, Irlanda, Germania, Spania si Danemarca au obtinut scoruri foarte slabe, impartind soarta opozitiei alaturi de alte partide.

Bulgaria, Romania si Slovacia sunt singurele exceptii unde partidele socialdemocrate depasesc marja de 25%.

 

 

 

Publicat în 2 mai 2013 alegeri locale in Anglia; Tara Galilor si Scotia, alegeri anticipate colegiul 1 sectorul 1 Bucuresti, alegeri anticipate colegiul 19 sectorul 4 Bucuresti, alegeri anticipate in landul Renania de Nordwestfalia, alegeri europarlamentare 2014, alegeri locale 10 octombrie, alegeri locale 1992, Alegeri locale 2012, alegeri locale Bavaria, alegeri locale Berlin 2011, Alegeri locale Italia 2011, alegeri locale partiale Sanislau, Alegeri locale Saxonia Inferioara, alegeri locale spania 2010, alegeri locale Spania 2011, alegeri locale Viena, alegeri parlamentare 1937, alegeri parlamentare 1990, alegeri parlamentare 2008, alegeri parlamentare 2012, alegeri parlamentare 2016, alegeri parlamentare 9 decembrie, alegeri parlamentare 9 decembrie 2012, alegeri parlamentare anticipate, alegeri parlamentare anticipate 2012, alegeri parlamentare anticipate 25.05.2014, alegeri parlamentare anticipate Grecia, alegeri parlamentare anticipate Tara Hategului, alegeri parlamentare cehia, alegeri parlamentare Franta 2012, Alegeri parlamentare Italia, alegeri parlamentare marea britanie, alegeri parlamentare Olanda, alegeri parlamentare republica moldova, alegeri parlamentare Serbia, alegeri parlamentare Slovacia 2012, alegeri parlamentare Spania 2011, alegeri parlamentare ungaria 2010, alegeri parlamentare Venezuela, alegeri parlamentaree 1946, alegeri partiale colegiul 3 Hunedoara, alegeri prezidentiale 2 noiembrie 2014, alegeri prezidentiale 2009, alegeri prezidentiale 2014, alegeri prezidentiale anticipate, alegeri prezidentiale Franta 2012, alegeri prezidentiale Slovacia, alegeri primar Baia Mare, alegeri Ramnicu Valcea, alegeri regionale Franta, Alegeri regionale Franta 2010, alegeri ungaria 2010, Alegerile europarlamentare (22-25.05.2014), alegerile europarlamentare 2019, alegerile europarlamentare 22-25 mai 2014, alegerile europarlamentare din 25 mai 2014, alegerile parlamentare 2016, Alegerile parlamentare din Germania - sondaje si proiectii electorale, Alegerile pentru Parlamentul European din 22 - 25 mai 2014, BUFONII IN ALEGERILE DIN ITALIA, calendar alegeri parlamentare 2012, PSD, PSDR, Uncategorized. Leave a Comment »

ÎMPĂRŢIREA EUROPEI

Analiza publicata pe

stelian-tanase.ro

9.154.306+1

In seara lui 6 Decembrie 2009 s-a instaurat regimul autoritar de inspiratie chavez-franchista. Trasaturile acestui sistem este parlamentul unicameral, model aplicat in Coreea de Nord si Zimbawbe, presedintele jucator, partidul non-ideologic de stat. PDL, fost PD, fost PD (FSN), fost FSN, formatiunea care poarta drept symbol electoral garoafa comunistei Roxa Luxemburg.

13 ianuarie 2012 marcheaza inceputul Contrarevolutiei Libertatii. Ernst Jünger, titanul dreptei germane, parafraza ca „revolutiiile se citesc in stele”. Ernst Jünger a avut dreptate. Sa recapitulam etapele Contrarevolutiei Libertatii.

Unicele partide parlamentare antitotalitare si prodemocratice: Partidul National Liberal, Partidul Socialdemocrat si PC au format Uniunea Social Liberala. Acestora format s-a alaturat la centur-stanga esichierului  UNPR si Miscarea Verzilor-Democratia Agrarier. La dre A urmat detronarea guverSuspendarea este numai o etapa intermediara in procesul politic al restauratiei monarhiste. Miscarea monarhista trebuie sa se mobilizeze exemplar si sa promovam peste tot mesajul nostru: Jos Basescu! Traiasca Regele Mihai! 8 noiembrie 2012, ziua care marcheaza demonstratia anticomunista, antitotalitarista si promonarhista din 8 noiembrie 1945, trebuie sa ne regaseasca pe toti in Piata Palatului Regal, alaturi de MS Regele Mihai, reprezentantul si alesul lui Dumnezeu! Republica este un sistem politic strain si anacronic pentru Romania. Am avut republici-soviete de stanga care au avut ca rezultat Gulagul si teroarea comunista. Am avut republici-autoritare de dreapta care au basculat in fascism si nazism, in lagare de concentrare si in stadioane de fotbal reconditionate in lagere de detentie open-air. Pentru Romania numai monarhia parlamentara (res publica mix) este forma definitiva si viabila. Nihil sine Deo, nihil sine Rex!

46


Incepand de astazi blogul AliantaDreptei se afla in campanie electorala.

Din punct de vedere personal campania referendumului prezidential este campania cu nr. 46.
Mai jos cititi palmaresul electoral absolvit pentru doua partide, in doua sisteme electorale.

Partidul Liberal din Germania * Freie Demokratische Partei
Parlamentare – Germania: 06.03.1983, 25.01.1987, 02.12.1990, 16.10.1994, 27.00.1998, 22.09.2002, 18.09.2005, 27.09.2009
Parlamentare – Republica Democrata Germania: 18.03.1990
Regionale – Renania de Nordwestfalia: 12.05.1985, 13.05.1990, 14.05.1995, 14.05.2000, 22.05.2005, 09.05.2010, 13.05.2012
Locale – Köln: 30.09.1984, 01.10.1989, 16.10.1994, 12.09.1999, 03.09.2000, 26.09.2004, 30.09.2009
Europarlamentare – Germania: 17.06.1984, 18.06.1989, 12.06.1994, 13.06.1999, 13.06.2004, 07.06.2009
Consiliul Consultativ al Migrantilor din Köln: 07.02.2010
Partidul National Liberal * Nationalliberale Partei
Parlamentare – Romania – Colegiul 43: 20.05.1990, 27.09.1992, 03.11.1996, 26.11.2000, 28.11.2004, 30.11.2008
Prezidentiale – Romania – Colegiul 43: 20.05.1990, 27.09./11.10.1992, 03.11./17.11.1996, 26.11./10.12.2000, 28.11./12.12.2004, 22.12./06.12.2009
Europarlamentare – Romania – Colegiul 43: 25.11.2007, 07.06.2009
Referenduri prezidentiale – Colegiul 43: 19.05.2007, 29.07.2012

De ce popularii europeni reactioneaza dur contra ROMÂNIEI

Analiza publicata pe blogul
stelian-tanase.ro

Press-release publicat, vineri 6. iulie 2012, de deputatul federal Günther Krichbaum, deputat federal colegiul Pforzheim:

Günther Krichheim, deputat federal Uniunea Crestindemocrata, colegiul Pforzheim:

Puci împotriva instituţiilor statului român

„În legătură cu procedura de suspendare iniţiată de Parlamentul României împotriva preşedintelui Traian Băsescu şi cu restrângerea atribuţiilor Curţii Constituţionale oferă lămuriri deputaţii Michael Stübgen, purtător de cuvânt pentru afaceri europene al grupului CDU/CSU din Parlamentul federal German şi Gunther Krichbaum, preşedintele Comisiei pentru Afaceri Europene a Bundestag-ului.
„Grupul CDU/CSU din Bundestag observă cu mare îngrijorare transformarea structurilor statale ale României într-o democraţie ghidată. Solicităm refacerea statului de drept. În aceste condiţii accesul României în spaţiul Schengen este pus serios sub semnul întrebării.“

Sursa informationala: Gunther Krichbaum MdB

Odată cu schimbările politice radicale şi începutul căderii regimului Băsescu, România se vede pusă la zid de cei care ar trebui să o reprezinte în lume. Pentru aceştia, pierderea puterii lor personale, înseamnă “ameninţarea democraţiei”, etc. Ofensiva de imagine antiUSL este dirijată de la Bruxelles de parlamentarii europeni PDL. Iată un document cu totul relevant trimis de Monica Macovei colegilor d-sale în care dă dovadă de un zel demn de o cauză mai bună.

From: Cabinet Monica Macovei [office@monicamacovei.eu]

Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2012 2:42 PM

To: Cabinet Monica Macovei

Subject: Romania, July 3-6: Facts and Laws

Dear all,

I attach a short document in English, explaining the events (facts and laws) of July 3-6, 2012, in Romania, when a procedure for the suspension of the President of Romania took place.

I believe it is a clear document, written by a lawyer for people with non-legal backgrounds.

Sincerely yours,

Marilena Stancu / Assistant to MEP Monica Macovei / Alecu Russo 13-19, Ap. 3, Sector 2 /Bucuresti – 020522, Romania /Tel/Fax: (+4) 0216191989 / Mobil: (+4) 0726385038 /www.monicamacovei.eu /Romania: July 3 – 6, 2012 /

Facts and Laws

July 3, 2012

The Ombudsman is replaced by the Social Liberal Union (USL) majority -in power since May 2012. Replacement is contrary to the law: Art. 9/2 of Law 35/1997 reads that the Ombudsman can be revoked following „a violation of the Constitution and of the laws, … upon the joint report of the Parliamentary Juridical Committees”. The extraordinary parliamentary session to revoke and replace the Ombudsman was called in the absence of any report from the Juridical Committees. The new Ombudsman, Valer Dorneanu has been member of the Social Democrat Party for 10 years (2000-2010) and 4 years member of the Chamber of Deputies.

Important: only the Ombudsman can challenge the constitutionality of Emergency Ordinances adopted by the Government. Emergency Ordinances will be adopted the next days, as follows.

July 4, 2012

Ponta Government adopts the Emergency Ordinance no. 38 modifying Art. 27 of the law on the Constitutional Court (law 47/1992).

 Article 27 before the change: “The Constitutional Court decides on the constitutionality of the Parliament’s rules of procedures, decisions of the Chamber of Deputies, decisions of the Senate and decisions of the plenary of the two Chambers jointly upon the complaint of one of the spokesperson, a parliamentary group or at least 50 deputies or 25 senators”.

 Article 27 after the change: “ The Constitutional Court decides on the constitutionality of the Parliament’s rules of procedures upon the complaint of one of the spokesperson, a parliamentary group or at least 50 deputies or 25 senators” (the part in bold was eliminated)

(i) Important: the suspension of the President will take place on July 6th by a “decision” of the Parliament, which will be outside the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court after this change.

(ii) This Emergency Ordinance is published on the same day in the Official Journal (Monitorul Oficial nr. 445/4 iulie) and enters into force.

(iii) This Emergency Ordinance breaches Article 115/6 of the Constitution: “Emergency Ordinances cannot be adopted in the area of constitutional laws and they cannot interfere with the state fundamental institutions’ regime”. This Emergency Ordinance interfered with Parliament and Constitutional Court regime; it was adopted exactly in the area of a constitutional law; urgency cannot be justified; a legislative proposal operating the same change had been adopted by the Parliament a few days ago and was before the Constitutional Court (CC); the Emergency Ordinance copy pastes this change without waiting for the CC decision. Complaints addressed to the Ombudsman remained unanswered. Ombudsman is silent.

July 5, 2012

 The procedure to suspend the President starts: the claim that the President perpetrated „ serious facts that violated the Constitution” is read in the Parliament. President replies.

 The vote on the suspension is scheduled for the next day, July 6.

 Crin Antonescu, the head of the Liberal Party, newly appointed spokesperson of the Senate asks the Constitution Court to issue its „opinion” until next day 12.00, and states that the Parliament will go ahead even without the Court’s opinion. The Constitutional Court’s opinion is required by Art. 95 of the Constitution, which does not provide for any deadline. Such a request had never been done since 1990.

 In the evening, Ponta Government adopts the Emergency Ordinance 41 modifying Art. 10 of the Law 3/2000 on the Referendum. It is published in the Official Journal the same day and enters into force:

Art. 10 before the change: „The dismissal of the President is approved with the majority of the votes of the citizens registered in the electoral lists.”

Art. 10 after the change: „By derogation from Art 5/2*, the dismissal of the President is approved with the majority of the citizens participating at the referendum”.

*Art. 5/2: „The referendum is valid if at least half plus one of the persons registered in the permanent electoral lists participate at the referendum”.

Important: (i) the change refers only to the referendum for the dismissal of the president; for any other referendum the validity requiring the majority of the persons registered in the electoral lists was not changed; (ii) the rules on the referendum to dismiss the President have been changed in the middle of the suspension process.

July 6, 2012

 14.00: the Constitutional Court issues its „opinion”: it does not provide a clear yes or no for the whole claim, but it does not say, at any of the claims, that they were „serious facts that violated the Constitution”. One of the judges with the CC claims she had been seriously threatened and tabled a complaint with the General Attorney.

 

 17.00: The Parliament debates the suspension and votes; although the spokesperson of the Senate announces at the beginning of the session that the „opinion” of the Constitutional Court will be read in the plenary, the CC opinion is not read and the objections raised by the opposition are rejected; the entire procedure ends at about 20.00. President is suspended with 256 votes through a decision of the Parliament. The date for the referendum to dismiss or not the President is set for July 29.

The suspension procedure lasted two days and laws were changed days before and during the procedure.

Sursa informationala:

stelian-tanase.ro

 

Daurel's Blog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Florin Citu

A look at financial markets and government policies through the eye of a skeptic

La Stegaru'

"Aveţi de apărat onoarea de a fi stegari!", Nicolae Pescaru

ADRIAN NĂSTASE

Pune întrebarea și, împreună, vom găsi răspunsul!

Sociollogica

"Istoria ne legitimeaza ca singurele partide autentice de centru-dreapta", Crin Antonescu

Carl Schmitt Studien

"Istoria ne legitimeaza ca singurele partide autentice de centru-dreapta", Crin Antonescu

%d blogeri au apreciat asta: